Re: Machining Tips!

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:59:18 +0000 (UTC), Black Dragon <bd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>Cliff wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:26:21 +0000 (UTC), Black Dragon
<bd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>
>
>>>Cliff wrote:
>
>>>> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:54:41 +0000 (UTC), Black Dragon
<bd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>Cliff wrote:
>
>>>>>>   I'm trying for an AUK award perhaps.
>
>>>>>Wackjobs like you deserve one.
>
>>>>   Then there are those that alter & forge posts & quotes ....
>
>>>Please provide the message ids of the posts I've altered and forged.
>
>>   In g5so6h$23bd$4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 you altered the text that had originally 
>> been "He's trying for an AUK award perhaps." to read as 
>> ">   I'm trying for an AUK award perhaps." while claiming that
>> "Cliff wrote:" it.
>>   That counts on both counts.
>
>OK, that's a "post edit". Changing quoted text which changes its meaning.

  "That counts on both counts."

>You've been doing a similar thing for ages by fiddling with quoted
>context to totally change the meaning of what people write.

  I've altered no words with ONE exception. I sometimes correct bad
spelling/typos (it just bugs me) without comment.

>That's not a forgery as you have repeatedly claimed it is though.

 "Cliff wrote:" it when you altered the words is.

>Is ignorance really that bliss?

  Then there were batches of forged posts I did not make ... but
thanks for your comments about that idiot forging newspaper 
stuff from Detroit. I suspect that the actual person from the 
newspaper had some words for them too.
-- 
Cliff