This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
..
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
..
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
..
Conclusion:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going
to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
|
