brewertr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2008 02:49:20 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
> <jon_banquer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>>>I read them, do YOU?
>>
>>You read my comments and are too ignorant and stupid to understand
>>them, Brewer.
>>
>>
>>>If you are going to lie you really should try to keep track of them so
>>>you don't step on your dick like you did here.
>>
>>You should stop lying, Brewer. All you do is continue to make a total
>>fool out of yourself as I nail your worthless ass to the wall with
>>your incompetence.
>
>
> LOL......delusional, you must be off your med's again.
>
>
>>>You have been posting all over the net that you are a CNC
>>>Machinist/Programmer and YOU are making engineering changes
>>
>>Many shops do, Brewer you're just too ignorant / dumb to understand
>>this.
>
>
> So you made it up and are now changing your story?
>
> You have been posting all over the net that "YOU" do it now you
> changed it to "Many shops do".
>
>
>>>Reminds me of your infamous Novedge interview. Where you didn't keep
>>>your agreement with the author and gave three different excuses on
>>>three separate occasions why.
>>
>>http://worldcadaccess.typepad.com/blog/2007/07/spend-a-littleo.html#comment-76366100
>>
>>Reminds me of just how dumb and ignorant you really are, Brewer. It
>>also reminds me how you try and twist the truth to suit your needs.
>>Your entire style is very Nazi like.
>
>
> I am not twisting anything Jon, it's your words, your actions. It
> seems you forgot all the excuses (AKA: Lies) you used and posted since
> you only linked to one.
>
> Excuse #1
>
> [
>
>>Why not just use your real name instead of stooping to their level?"
>
> Because it can't be done without wasting massive amounts of my time!
> ] - Jon Banquer on Jul 9 2007
>
> Excuse #1 Translation:
>
> You couldn't do it because being honest and keeping your word takes
> too much time.
>
> Excuse #2
>
> [
> I figured for once I'd give these posters a taste or their own
> medicine which seemed to anger the host of the Blog who had elected to
> go with an unmoderated format.
> ] -Jon Banquer- July 18, 2007-
>
> Excuse #2 Translation:
>
> You were getting even with posters for disagreeing with you but you
> couldn't do it using your name, you had to forge & post under multiple
> false names, which was a violation of your agreement with the author.
> And the author used the same format he does with ALL his interviewees.
>
> Excuse #3
>
> [
>
>>Franco Folini.
>
>
> Is a CADCAM salesman. Imagine someone getting even with a CADCAM
> salesman instead of being taken advantage of one.
> ] -Jon Banquer - March 4, 2008
>
> Excuse #3 Translation:
>
> You made the agreement with the author but never had any intention of
> keeping your word.
>
>
>>>Your excuses spanned a period of a few months and evolved as you went
because you seemed to have forgot what
>>>you said.
>>
>>Your excuses and incompetence has been displayed for years, Brewer.
>>See your own words below as you make mistake after mistake after
>>mistake and now lie to try and cover up your many, many mistakes and
>>total incompetence.
>
>
> EXACTLY what lies Jon. You keep making these unfounded accusations but
> have yet to post ONE lie.
>
> Tom
And that, folks, pretty much sums up the latest round of Banquerbabble!
Thanks for refre****ng our memories, Tom.
gk
|
