> For some reason, your approval (or lack of) of my comments doesn't mean
> a whole lot to me. Maybe it's because most of your usenet posting seems
> to be along the lines that follow:
Didn't expect that it would. You are still totally unable to see how
im****tant it is to be able to have a quick, complete and easy way to
overview all the complex relations that SolidWorks often creates.
Instead, you and most SolidWorks users settle for a very low level
tool to try and do this... using roll back. It's not about me, Gary.
It's about having the right tools for the job. Your accept low level
tools that take inordinate amounts of time to use and instead wish to
focus your frustrations on me because I don't accept what most
people / you accept as adequate tools. It's so much easier for idiots
like you and Brewer this way.
I have yet to use the "F" word in this response. Time to change that,
Gary.
Do you ****ing get it yet?
How many more years till idiots like you and Brewer finally ****ing
get it?
Stare at the pictures here and see if you can get a ****ing clue about
the kind of tools that are needed in SolidWorks:
www.solidmap.com
Try really, really hard to focus on the tools rather than on a product
(SolidMap) that has been re****ted to cost too much and not do the job
well enough. Even if that's true it's not im****tant. What's im****tant
is the concept and the approach to a major problem. Someday idiots
like you and Brewer might actually understand this but I'm not holding
my breath.
Jon Banquer
San Diego,CA
|
