On Feb 22, 9:11 pm, gk <g...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> jon_banquer wrote:
> >>In other words, you want something that you can use without putting
> >>forth any real effort (watching videos probably isn't enough).
Probably
> >>not going to happen.
>
> > In other words, Nuts son you can't be honest about SolidWork
> > limitations and are happy to give up having control over all the
> > relations that SolidWorks creates. Instead of being honest you wish to
> > pretend you have the control when nothing could be further from the
> > truth.
>
> >>That help...?
>
> > Not really, it's just more of the same bullshit from you Nuts son.
> > This is further proof that you don't really understand all the complex
> > relations SolidWorks creates. It's also very likely that you don't
> > have to heavily parametrically modify models and assemblies done by
> > someone else.
>
> > Jon Banquer
> > San Diego,CA
>
> How am I being dishonest? I just don't find Solidworks "taking control"
> over relations to be factor in my work. I am not pretending anything.
> I guess maybe SW just takes over and I'm along for the ride. If this is
> the case, the ride is pleasant (mostly). BTW, I don't find ProE to be
> any better or worse in this respect - just different.
>
> If I have to "heavily parametrically modify" models and assemblies done
> by someone else I will either do so or remodel - whichever makes the
> most sense time-wise. Someone elses SW models make take some effort to
> figure out the construction but it certainly isn't what I would classify
> as difficult (remember, rollback is your friend).
>
> Bottom line, I don't claim to be a SW "expert" but I certainly don't
> have any trouble getting my work done. YMMV
>
> gk
Probably your best post in ten years on Usenet. I'm shocked.
Jon Banquer
San Diego,CA
|
