jon_banquer wrote:
>>In other words, you want something that you can use without putting
>>forth any real effort (watching videos probably isn't enough). Probably
>>not going to happen.
>
>
> In other words, Nuts son you can't be honest about SolidWork
> limitations and are happy to give up having control over all the
> relations that SolidWorks creates. Instead of being honest you wish to
> pretend you have the control when nothing could be further from the
> truth.
>
>
>>That help...?
>
>
> Not really, it's just more of the same bull**** from you Nuts son.
> This is further proof that you don't really understand all the complex
> relations SolidWorks creates. It's also very likely that you don't
> have to heavily parametrically modify models and assemblies done by
> someone else.
>
> Jon Banquer
> San Diego,CA
>
>
How am I being dishonest? I just don't find Solidworks "taking control"
over relations to be factor in my work. I am not pretending anything.
I guess maybe SW just takes over and I'm along for the ride. If this is
the case, the ride is pleasant (mostly). BTW, I don't find ProE to be
any better or worse in this respect - just different.
If I have to "heavily parametrically modify" models and assemblies done
by someone else I will either do so or remodel - whichever makes the
most sense time-wise. Someone elses SW models make take some effort to
figure out the construction but it certainly isn't what I would classify
as difficult (remember, rollback is your friend).
Bottom line, I don't claim to be a SW "expert" but I certainly don't
have any trouble getting my work done. YMMV
gk
|
