Talk About Network

Google





Computer Aided Design - CAD > Parametric Technology's Pro/Engineer > Re: ProE on Win...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 15 Topic 2786 of 3008
Post > Topic >>

Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional

by "Janes" <djanes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 3, 2008 at 09:07 AM

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C86644.2594B0D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

  "CADaholic" <CADaholic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:014fce77-1373-4da3-beef-8b97ad7d93e0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  I second that.  I used the 3 gig switch for over a year and it worked
  very well.


  > Ben's comments show that a 64 bit system is a good way of =
eliminating the memory restrictions built into 32 bit systems. But also =
consider setting the 3 gig switch in the XP boot.ini file. It extends =
useable memory. The Microsoft website has intructions for how to do =
this. You may also find the XP Help on "bootcfg" useful. Or Google this =
NG for 3 gig switch as this topic has come up before, but not recently.
  >
  > David Janes

I've had good experience with it, too. As is Bertil, I was bumping into =
the memory ceiling, everything slowing down, freezing, cra****ng. Then IT =
installed the maximum 4 gigs of RAM, thinking this would cure the =
problem. It helped a little, but not enough until they set the /3G =
switch. It can have its down side as it reassigns a gig of system memory =
to user memory, but all the memory problems, slowness and cra****ng went =
away.

That said, it's the cheap and dirty way of extending the life of a =
system. And, if it doesn't work, if you're still hitting the ceiling, =
you are buying the 64 bit system. So, if it works, great, but recognize =
that it could be a tem****ary fix if your memory demands keep growing. =
Since memory has always come at a premium on the big, expensive =
workstations, Pro/e built in a lot of memory management tools that help =
greatly with the memory restrictions. I'm thinking of Simp Reps and =
shrinkwrapped assemblies for space claim objects and even the use of =
surface models which tend to be much lighter weight that hundreds of =
features. IOW, balancing the brute force method of bigger, faster =
hardware with some sophisticated techniques. The latter is where I have =
to most room to grow, the fewest people to convince, the most initiative =
and often, the biggest payoff.

David Janes
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C86644.2594B0D0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3243" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"CADaholic" &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:CADaholic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">CADaholic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt; wrote =
in message=20
  <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:014fce77-1373-4da3-beef-8b97ad7d93e0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:014fce77-1373-4da3-beef-8b97ad7d93e0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...</DIV>I=20
  second that.&nbsp; I used the 3 gig switch for over a year and it=20
  worked<BR>very well.<BR><BR><BR>&gt; Ben's comments show that a 64 bit =
system=20
  is a good way of eliminating the memory restrictions built into 32 bit =

  systems. But also consider setting the 3 gig switch in the XP boot.ini =
file.=20
  It extends useable memory. The Microsoft website has intructions for =
how to do=20
  this. You may also find the XP Help on "bootcfg" useful. Or Google =
this NG for=20
  3 gig switch as this topic has come up before, but not=20
  recently.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; David Janes<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>I've had good experience with it, too. As is Bertil, I was bumping =
into the=20
memory ceiling, everything slowing down, freezing, cra****ng. Then IT =
installed=20
the maximum 4 gigs of RAM, thinking this would cure the problem. It =
helped a=20
little, but not enough until they set the /3G switch. It can have its =
down side=20
as it reassigns a gig of system memory to user memory, but all the =
memory=20
problems, slowness and cra****ng went away.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>That said, it's the cheap and dirty way of extending the life of a =
system.=20
And, if it doesn't work, if you're still hitting the ceiling, you are =
buying the=20
64 bit system. So, if it works, great, but recognize that it could be a=20
tem****ary fix if your memory demands keep growing. Since memory has =
always come=20
at a premium on the big, expensive workstations, Pro/e built in a lot of =
memory=20
management tools that help greatly with the memory restrictions. I'm =
thinking of=20
Simp Reps and&nbsp;shrinkwrapped assemblies for space claim objects and =
even the=20
use of surface models which tend to be much lighter weight that hundreds =
of=20
features. IOW, balancing the brute force method of bigger, faster =
hardware with=20
some sophisticated techniques. The latter is where I have to most room =
to grow,=20
the fewest people to convince, the most initiative and often, the =
biggest=20
payoff.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>David Janes</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C86644.2594B0D0--
 




 15 Posts in Topic:
ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Bertil Rogmark"  2008-02-01 20:34:03 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Janes" <dja  2008-02-01 15:39:17 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Ben & Mickie Lo  2008-02-01 18:12:46 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Janes" <dja  2008-02-01 17:10:17 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Bertil Rogmark"  2008-02-02 06:33:37 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Janes" <dja  2008-02-02 06:49:03 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
CADaholic <CADaholic@[  2008-02-03 02:33:45 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Janes" <dja  2008-02-03 09:07:05 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
dgp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-04 05:53:30 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Janes" <dja  2008-02-04 17:14:10 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
graminator <grahamew@[  2008-02-04 10:56:56 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Janes" <dja  2008-02-04 17:34:42 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
David Geesaman <dgeesa  2008-02-04 20:50:55 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
"Janes" <dja  2008-02-04 18:57:24 
Re: ProE on Windows XP 64 Professional
krullmi <krullmi@[EMAI  2008-02-21 04:52:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 19:15:01 PST 2009.