"gluteous maximus equus" <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:13oh39hhd1tha9d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
....snip
> The overwhelming bulk of im****t repair is cleaning
> up or recreating nasty trim edges and aligning vertices
I'm still looking for a decent 'course' on this. Ideas? Tutorials?
>
>> binary
>
> Can you show me an unmoderated binary forum that's worth a
> windfall fig for anything except downloading Fanny Does Fido
> [1 of 82, 2 of 82, ... Fido's quite the performer] mpg's?
Good point, so moderated first, then binary might make sense. Most
moderation is done with bots, anyway, and only posts to the moderator what
is in doubt.
> If there's a way around that I'd say go for it but I don't
> really see the point. There are places to take discussions
> that require data exchange to facilitate a solution and this
> is the only Pro/E forum of it's kind in existence.
>
If it were moderated and binary, it would still be, on USENET, the "only
Pro/E forum of it's kind in existence." Of course, by 'of its kind', you
might mean 'for texters only'. However, to my mind, what makes this unique
is not the text/binary business, but the fact that it's on USENET, that
it's
a newsgroup. That, to me, is VERY im****tant. Anyone on earth, with an
Internet connection and a news provider, can find us and find out about
Pro/e. Free! No stupid "registration". No lines, no waiting!
Participation,
being there, weighing in, contributing, helping out around the place is
the
only "requirement".
David Janes
|
