Re: spamming in our forum

On Jan 7, 6:38 pm, "gluteous maximus equus" <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> So why isn't comp.cad.pro-engineer a binary NG
> > shake my head, filter what i can, and try to ignore...
>
> I agree.  Enjoy the group for what it is.  Laid back, low
> traffic, not over run with s**** oil peddlers and dumass
> skool kids trying to find someone to do their lab assignments
> or, krishna forbid, gigabytes of binary spam and wow-the-
> kiddies-ain't-I-cool renderings.
>
> The technical content is above average for usenet but I read
> the group mostly to catch your unique perspective on things,
> Dave. Maintain the high standard of excellence.  8*)

I agree. i think we should this NG comp.cad.dave.janes.