This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C85062.565E3210
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Von" <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:Xns9A1CAEC0AAD29lartssbcglobalnet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Janes" <djanes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:PVBfj.27828$yV5.20409@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=20
> The real solution would of course be electroconvulsive therapy.
>=20
>=20
> I disagree: 5 years solitary without access to a computer, FOLLOWED =
BY
> ANOTHER FIVE YEARS OF OPRAH RERUNS. AND STILL NO ACCESS TO A =
COMPUTER.
> Take his freakin' puter away from him.... and his useless freedom. =
He
> can't handle it anyway! Doesn't know what to do with it, abuses it,
> mocks it... like the NAZIs who mocked democracy and those who
> practiced it as weaklings, saps, degenerates. **** this asshole, =
drop
> him in a hole. And, if you can find out ANYTHING from his header,
> track him, re****t him, dog him, spam him back, harrass him, haunt =
him,
> crap on him any way you can. Likely it's faked, though, so before =
you
> jump in his ****, send a friendly email to see if you get a friendly
> reply. Or use WHOIS to track his URL/IP address and notify his =
service
> provider that he's a low life, s*** sucking pig.=20
>=20
> But, after using USENET for years, in an unmoderated NG, I'd have to
> say that I'm most disturbed by the fact that USENET is so USELESS.
> Someone from there will jump in YOUR **** if you dare post a dumbass
> binary file on this group, no matter how useful and appropriate it =
is,
> but they couldn't care less that tons of bandwidth is being taken up
> with this kind of totally inappropriate, uselss, disruptive, non-NG,
> spammed material. USENET should be stopping this **** and they have
> the technical resources to do it. Call them and complain.=20
>=20
> My 5=A2
>=20
> David Janes
David,
You need to get a decent news provider,=20
This is probably, actually, a very good idea. My news provider is =
whatever Cox.net signed up for and is some off-brand **** that barely =
works for normal stuff. However, I still say that, if your news service =
can filter the most OBVIOUS spam, so could the dumbass, useless USENET =
****s that rule their quaint little world while taking absolutely no =
responsibility for what goes over it except to stupidly, meaninglessly =
distinguish between binary and ASCII newsgroups. And, if they were =
truely and really concerned about the sacred 'bandwidth', they'd =
immediately get rid of ALT.anything.... They obviously aren't seriously =
worried about bandwidth; and the distinction and hullaballoo about =
binary posts on ASCII newsgroups is a hoax, a sham, a scam, a retreat to =
some mindless USENET dogmatism while they play CYA over the lack of any =
real solution.
David Janes
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C85062.565E3210
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3243" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Von" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:Xns9A1CAEC0AAD29lartssbcglobalnet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:Xns9A=
1CAEC0AAD29lartssbcglobalnet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...</DIV>
<DIV>"Janes" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:djanes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">djanes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote=20
in<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"news:PVBfj.27828$yV5.20409@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:PVBfj.27828$yV5.204=
09@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:=20
<BR><BR>> <BR>> The real solution would of course be =
electroconvulsive therapy.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> I disagree: 5 =
years=20
solitary without access to a computer, FOLLOWED BY<BR>> ANOTHER =
FIVE YEARS=20
OF OPRAH RERUNS. AND STILL NO ACCESS TO A COMPUTER.<BR>> Take his =
freakin'=20
puter away from him.... and his useless freedom. He<BR>> can't =
handle it=20
anyway! Doesn't know what to do with it, abuses it,<BR>> mocks =
it... like=20
the NAZIs who mocked democracy and those who<BR>> practiced it as=20
weaklings, saps, degenerates. **** this asshole, drop<BR>> him in a =
hole.=20
And, if you can find out ANYTHING from his header,<BR>> track him, =
re****t=20
him, dog him, spam him back, harrass him, haunt him,<BR>> crap on =
him any=20
way you can. Likely it's faked, though, so before you<BR>> jump in =
his=20
****, send a friendly email to see if you get a friendly<BR>> =
reply. Or use=20
WHOIS to track his URL/IP address and notify his service<BR>> =
provider that=20
he's a low life, s*** sucking pig. <BR>> <BR>> But, after using =
USENET=20
for years, in an unmoderated NG, I'd have to<BR>> say that I'm most =
disturbed by the fact that USENET is so USELESS.<BR>> Someone from =
there=20
will jump in YOUR **** if you dare post a dumbass<BR>> binary file =
on this=20
group, no matter how useful and appropriate it is,<BR>> but they =
couldn't=20
care less that tons of bandwidth is being taken up<BR>> with this =
kind of=20
totally inappropriate, uselss, disruptive, non-NG,<BR>> spammed =
material.=20
USENET should be stopping this **** and they have<BR>> the =
technical=20
resources to do it. Call them and complain. <BR>> <BR>> My =
5=A2<BR>>=20
<BR>> David Janes<BR><BR><BR>David,<BR><BR>You need to get a decent =
news=20
provider, </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>This is probably, actually, a very good idea. My news provider is =
whatever=20
Cox.net signed up for and is some off-brand **** that barely works for =
normal=20
stuff. However, I still say that, if your news service can filter the =
most=20
OBVIOUS spam, so could the dumbass, useless USENET ****s that =
rule=20
their quaint little world while taking absolutely no responsibility for =
what=20
goes over it except to stupidly, meaninglessly distinguish between =
binary=20
and ASCII newsgroups. And, if they were truely and really concerned =
about the=20
sacred 'bandwidth', they'd immediately get rid of ALT.anything.... They=20
obviously aren't seriously worried about bandwidth; and the distinction =
and=20
hullaballoo about binary posts on ASCII newsgroups is a hoax, a sham, a =
scam, a=20
retreat to some mindless USENET dogmatism while they play CYA over the =
lack of=20
any real solution.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>David Janes</DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C85062.565E3210--
|
