Ralph Hertle <zxcvzxcv3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in news:478A330B.1040703
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [ 255 grays ]
> [ 255 reds ]
> [ 255 greens ]
> [ 255 blues ]
Easy to do, and not a large image size. Been there. Done that.
> I would make the file into an uncompressed .tif file that you suggest,
> and it could be display in most image display programs and be printed on
> a color printer at A or B photo paper sizes.
You'll also want to make sure your room illumination is
calibrated for. Viewing the printed product under incandescent
vs fluorescent lighting will result in a color ****ft.
How about this idea, which I learned a long time ago when I was
toying with a 3d rendering program. The book was discussing the
differences between a CAD program and the 3D program. It pointed
out that although you can model objects in the 3D renderer with
the utmost precision of a CAD program, it's not always necessary.
The suggestion was, "if it looks right, it is right".
My point is, you seem to be reinventing a very complex wheel
when all you are trying to do is walk across the room.
Are you sure you need all this precision and balance for your
intended application?
I tend to be a perfectionist myself but there comes a point where
you're just spinning your wheels. (like when I was trying to
come up with a formula to convert wavelength into RGB values
for a spectrum chart)
However, there is always the gratification of learning something
new and gaining understanding.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com
- Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
|
