Talk About Network

Google





Computer Aided Design - CAD > Cadence > Re: Linux compa...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 3991 of 4397
Post > Topic >>

Re: Linux compatible ith RHEL v 5

by Andrew Beckett <andrewb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 9, 2008 at 11:05 AM

Riad KACED wrote, on 05/08/08 21:53:
> Hi
> 
> The answer for your question is on the Cadence's web Site :
> http://www.cadence.com/
-> Sup****t Tab -> Computing Platform Sup****t
> The following links to this page may help you :
> 
> 
> 1. Cadence Platform Sup****t Road-map :
> http://www.cadence.com/sup****t/computing/Cadence_Platform_Sup****t_Pla...
> The PDF doc mentions the sup****t of RHEL 5.0 on X86_64 architectures
> for 2008.
> 
> 
> 2. Sup****ted Platform Matrix for Cadence Applications
> http://www.cadence.com/sup****t/computing/sup****t_platform.aspx
> The matrix shows the sup****t of RHEL 5.0 on both X86/X86_64
> architectures for ICS 6.1.2 (I guess it Virtuoso 6.1.2 but still
> wondering what the 'S' doing there)
> I'm wondering also if there is an unfortunate copy/paste regarding the
> sup****t of RHEL 5.0 for X86 (32). The above PDF does not mention it.
> 
> Anyway, the best for you to clear any doubt is to drop a quick email
> for Cadence folks, they are very nice and friendly ;-)
> 
> Hope it helps !
> 
> Riad.
> 
> 

There are previous postings from me on this forum discussing RHEL5 - I am 
actually using it on my laptop all the time for the last 6 months.
However,
the official sup****t is from IC612 onwards. The "S" that Riad noticed
indicates 
a "solution" release - usually this is a vehicle we have to use to
introduce now
licensed products, even if the actual code is not released as part of the
ICS612
stream.

See http://tinyurl.com/49kcqy
(which in turn references another post).

Actually the idea is to only sup****t RHEL5 in 64 bit mode. Given that
modern
hardware is 64 bit, there's a dimini****ng benefit in sup****ting on 32 bit 
hardware/OS. Nobody asks for Solaris sup****t on 32 bit for years now, so
there's no real reason why Linux should be any different. Many recent
laptops
(especially if you want to use them for compute purposes too) are also 64
bit
(mine is 64 bit and dual-core, for example).

Regards,

Andrew.
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Linux compatible ith RHEL v 5
supra <supradeep@[EMAI  2008-05-08 10:45:13 
Re: Linux compatible ith RHEL v 5
Riad KACED <riad.kaced  2008-05-08 13:53:22 
Re: Linux compatible ith RHEL v 5
Andrew Beckett <andrew  2008-05-09 11:05:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 13:19:21 PST 2009.