Re: I Want An Easier, Faster, Better CAD Tool

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:08:04 +0200, "moi" <noreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"Cliff" <Clhuprich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:97t7745t21r1en8nu2dlndl0sic6a7fj61@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 00:12:19 +0200, "moi" <noreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Cliff" <Clhuprich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:b98274tl1u3km8sulqkfdjsprr5lqee7p7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:29:19 +0200, "moi" <noreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>  Search out which kernel they switched to then.
>>>
>>>I know which "kernel" they are using...  It's their own.
>>>
>>>Find and post some accurate current info that indicates otherwise.
>>>Otherwise, I'll just take your silence as a tacit admission that you
have 
>>>no
>>>idea what you're talking about.
>>
>>  They may still be using the IntegrityWare "kernel" for solids
>> & that free/open NURBs "kernel" for surfaces.
>>  And playing a bit loose with the term "kernel" for this context?
>
>Nope.
>
>And that free/open nurbs kernel...  who do you think wrote that?
>
>What's a "kernel"...?   :-)

  They don't even call it a "kernel" at http://www.opennurbs.org
<G>.
-- 
Cliff