Talk About Network

Google





Computer Aided Design - CAD > CAD General > Re: I Want An E...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 3 Topic 1518 of 1928
Post > Topic >>

Re: I Want An Easier, Faster, Better CAD Tool

by larryrozer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jul 13, 2008 at 06:01 PM

On Jul 13, 6:44 pm, "nitnit" <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> http://en.wiki.mcneel.com/default.aspx/McNeel/RhinoHistory.html
>
> I don't know that not planting a worn out mechanical field is dumb.
>
> Why is it every wino with a dialup is an expert analyst?  Sad commentary
=
on the species.


The mechanical field is "worn out" because parametric-history based
modeling is over twenty years old and badly needs to be replaced with
better technology.

The op****tunity for new and better ideas for mechanical modeling has
an established market that badly needs and wants better tools.

I=92m sorry you have to use dial up and are a wino but I don't know what
that has to do with answering your question on what kernel (AG Lib)
Rhino use to use.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: I Want An Easier, Faster, Better CAD Tool
larryrozer@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-07-13 18:01:36 
Re: I Want An Easier, Faster, Better CAD Tool
"nitnit" <no  2008-07-13 21:13:16 
Re: I Want An Easier, Faster, Better CAD Tool
Cliff <Clhuprich@[EMAI  2008-07-14 12:50:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 1:10:56 PST 2009.