Re: I Want An Easier, Faster, Better CAD Tool

"Cliff" <Clhuprich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:97t7745t21r1en8nu2dlndl0sic6a7fj61@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 00:12:19 +0200, "moi" <noreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>>
>>"Cliff" <Clhuprich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:b98274tl1u3km8sulqkfdjsprr5lqee7p7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:29:19 +0200, "moi" <noreply@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>  Search out which kernel they switched to then.
>>
>>I know which "kernel" they are using...  It's their own.
>>
>>Find and post some accurate current info that indicates otherwise.
>>Otherwise, I'll just take your silence as a tacit admission that you
have 
>>no
>>idea what you're talking about.
>
>  They may still be using the IntegrityWare "kernel" for solids
> & that free/open NURBs "kernel" for surfaces.
>  And playing a bit loose with the term "kernel" for this context?

Nope.

And that free/open nurbs kernel...  who do you think wrote that?

What's a "kernel"...?   :-)

>  Why would they try to write their own?

To have complete control over its development.

>  Find any such mention on their Sites.

I don't need to.  I know what's going on there pretty well.

YOU find any mention that they're using something else...

--moi