On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 19:58:39 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jon_banquer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>You use no parametric-history based CAD product because it looks
>intimidating.
Coward.
"I'm the kind of person who doesn't learn very well reading pure
theory. I
get bored really quick." - Jon Banquer
>You don't want a massive learning curve learning stuff that seems
>stupid to you.
Clueless.
"I dropped out of high school to pursue my dream of making
a lot of money and never went back" - Jon Banquer
>You realize that you don't want to waste hours using a rollback bar to
>try and understand some pick your nose engineer's design intent just
>so you can modify their solid model
Hence all your posts on "design intent" being so
im****tant. BEFORE you hack-n-whack it into rubbish.
>to machine it.
Perhaps you should learn about CAD/CAM &/or CAM
systems.
Only YOU have all these claimed problems due to your massive ignorance.
"One word sums it up.....HANDWHEEL"
>You have to work with other people solid models.
You can last about 3 months max (on the clueless BS & hype).
Then they always catch on & find that there are no good parts
but lots of trashed ones.
The Zen of the RED button:
[
When my mind is deep in the code and I'm standing at the machine
editing or creating a program I can see the tool in my mind as cuts
the part. I'm like in another world.
] - jon banquer
[
In better shops people know when not to bother you. When
this happens on a frequent basis it's a good sign that
perhaps one should move on.
] - jon banquer
>You have to work with non-native solid models.
Such as ones im****ted from SW into SE?
>You use Mastercam and realize you want more powerful CAD.
CLUE: It's a CAM program, not a CAD program or a CAD/CAM
program.
>
>You have seen SolidWorks and don't wish to be a CAD expert.
YOU ARE A SUCCEESS !
>You use SolidWorks and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.
And as a non-user & non-CAD-expert you know this how?
>You use Pro/E and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.
And as a non-user & non-CAD-expert you know this how?
>You use Surfcam and realize Surfcam CAD leaves a lot to be desired.
CLUE: It's a CAM program, not a CAD program or a CAD/CAM
program.
>You use Featurecam and realize Featurecam CAD leaves a lot to be
>desired.
CLUE: It's a CAM program, not a CAD program or a CAD/CAM
program.
>You use Rhino and want a modeler that's much better for mechanical
>modeling.
CLUE: It's mostly a surface modeler & graphics tool.
>You use Mecsoft Visual Mill 6 and want a better CAD program.
CLUE: It's a CAM program, not a CAD program or a CAD/CAM
program.
>You use an old version of BobCRAP, hang up on their telemarketers and
>refuse to downgrade your old copy of BobCRAP to BobCRAP 2007 / V22 and
>give these lying Scientologist slime balls another dime.
You've never used it.
>I have some good news for you:
>
>I can show you a better way to model!
Bricks?
>If you are in the following categories you're a brain dead idiot and I
>can't help you:
>
>
>You use AutoCAD and think 2D is good enough.
AutoCAD is 3D.
>You use Gibbscam and think it's CAD and CAM are just fine and have no
>clue that Mastercam X2 blows Gibbscam away in most areas.
CLUE: MasterCAM is a 5 axes CAM program.
>You use BobCRAP 2007 / V22.
No, you don't.
>You use Alibre.
No, you don't.
>You think Matt Lombard is a genius and actually knows something about
>manufacturing.
He never claimed that. He knows SW.
And YOU know very little about manufacturing, CAD, CAM or CAD/CAM
& it shows in every post.
>You think Franco Folini is a genius and actually knows something about
>manufacturing.
CLUE: Has degree is in CS & he sells shrink-wrapped graphics
software on the Web.
>You think Novedge actually adds value to the CADCAM products they
>sell.
They seem to be a retailer, not a VAR.
And the term is "CAD/CAM".
>You think that CATIA is an affordable answer.
Get banquercadam !!!
>You think CATIA has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with Synchronous
>Technology has.
And you don't have a clue.
>You think SolidWorks has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with
>Synchronous Technology has.
SE does NOT YET HAVE "Synchronous Technology".
Nor is MasterCAM SW.
>The Jon Banquer blog has linked to a new video which makes it very
>clear how much better thought out Solid Edge with Synchronous
>Technology is and how easier it is to model with their new tools.
>
>http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/
<Snicker>
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
<jon_banquer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>> Post 'em, it won't cost you anything except for your time. But there
are a
>> lot more people with opinions than just me. Don't put too much stock
into
>> the opinions of just a few folks.
>
>This weekend I'll post a few and solicit your comments.
Yep.
More hype, BS & noise for va****ware.
Just like the long-promised "review of BBS sytems".
He did not.
"cutting through the bull****"
<Snicker>
>
>Jon Banquer
[
I'm committed to working with HSMWorks to doing just that. Shouldn't
be too hard because their head of US operations and I see things in
almost the exact same way and because HSMWorks is interested in what I
have to say and wants to work with me.
] - Jon Banquer -
[
Who I'm working with to deliver what truly will be the next generation
of CAM: www.hsmworks.com
] -Jon Banquer-
[
I understand why your shop did not go with HSMWorks. We have a lot of
work to do.
] - Jon Banquer
"Jon is not affiliated with HSMWorks ApS in any way and that we cannot
control what people are writing on the web."
"Anybody can get evaluation licenses of HSMWorks and test it
themselves."
"I hope this clarifies any doubt."
>San Diego, CA
Nope, not even that.
Remember the X-files episode "Clyde Bruckman's Final Repose"?
[
Puppet: "There's something I've been wanting to ask you for some time
now. You've seen the things I do in the past as well as in the
future."
Clyde Bruckman: "They're terrible things."
Puppet: "I know they are. So tell me, please, why have I done them."
Clyde Bruckman: "Don't you understand yet son? Don't you get it?"
[Killer shakes his head] "You do the things you do because you're a
homicidal maniac."
Puppet: "That... that does explain a lot, doesn't it. It's all
starting to make sense now."
]
--
Cliff
|
