On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:34:47 -0600, "madcadman" <mad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>"DaveB" <debco99@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:4866ba20.12023812@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:24:14 -0400, Cliff <Clhuprich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>[
>>>Updated 6-17-2008:
>>>
>>>the mastercam handbooks page
>>>
>>>coming this weekend to the mastercam handbooks page:
>>>
>>>Suggestions for covering layers which are not presently covered at all
in
>>>Mastercam Handbook Volume 1 and why making use of layers is so
im****tant
>>>for
>>>machining parts and is such a time saver, working with im****ted files
that
>>>can't
>>>be machinined "as is" because the part has been designed by someone who
>>>doesn't
>>>understand or care about the machining process.
>>>]
>>>
>>>[
>>>> I swear Iv'e tried job after job to make use of levels. I always end
up
>>>> finding a better way
>>>
>>>Because there is a better way. That's why there are no levels / layers
>>>in HSMWorks and the only levels / layers in SolidWorks are just for
>>>drawings.
>>>] - jon banquer on Oct 7 2007
>>>
>>> "The whole level manager needs to be-revamped into somthing usable."
-
>>> jon
>>>banquer
>>>
>>> "Layers / levels represent an Autocad past." - jon banquer
>>>
>>>[
>>>I'd also like to know from you or anyone else how it's possible for
>>>layers or levels in Mastercam, Surfcam, Gibbscam, etc. to compete with
>>>what
>>>SolidWorks uses .... assemblies and configurations.
>>>] - jon banquer
>>>
>>> Find his posts on how useless levels/layers are ...
>>>--
>>>Cliff
>>
>>
>> Cliff, why do you crosspost this dribble?
>> Daveb
>
>Because cliffy is a pathetic loser just like banquer (and now his
alter-ego:
>phil scott).
Thank you for your xpost, help, sup****t, answers & opines.
--
Cliff
|
