"Cliff" <Clhuprich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:qq8c64pjavbco70m53tkmqd7lhsjf4evin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:56:07 -0700 (PDT), phil scott
<phil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>On Jun 27, 6:40 pm, DaisyFlower <Flower...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> phil scott wrote:
>>> > is changing color the same as 'surfacing' ?
>>>
>>> > Phil scott
>>>
>>> Yeah, you know, they really are pretty close, when you really look at
>>> it. Never really saw it that way, but I guess you're right.
>>>
>>> Daisy
>>>
>>> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks... do you think I will be able to call out one chunk of a
>>single solid model, and call it ' copper piping' for instance and
>>another as steel piping color... etc and then edit the thing...or will
>>it have be all the same non colored model in order to edit it in SE
>>synch.
>>
>>I noticed in the SE synch assembly demo different colored parts in
>>the assembly were different colors but those were all im****ted
>>items... drawn variously in SW, inventor and ProE. and were in
>>fact editable.. for instance the entire assy, a vice was dragged
>>wider, and all the im****ted parts went along....so they did edit.. but
>>it was just differen colors...not 'surfacing' apparently.
>
> Don't let your chain be yanked.
> --
> Cliff
How can someone use a CAD system (even though it is a 2nd rate one such as
inventor) and not know what "surfacing" is and that is is not just
changing
colors or textures on a model? I belive "phil scott" is a fraud and is
really either jon banquer and/or phil huprich posing as a new member of
this
newsgroup.
|
