On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:25:47 GMT, debco99@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(DaveB) wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:24:14 -0400, Cliff <Clhuprich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>[
>>Updated 6-17-2008:
>>
>>the mastercam handbooks page
>>
>>coming this weekend to the mastercam handbooks page:
>>
>>Suggestions for covering layers which are not presently covered at all
in
>>Mastercam Handbook Volume 1 and why making use of layers is so im****tant
for
>>machining parts and is such a time saver, working with im****ted files
that can’t
>>be machinined “as is” because the part has been designed by someone who
doesn’t
>>understand or care about the machining process.
>>]
>>
>>[
>>> I swear Iv'e tried job after job to make use of levels. I always end
up
>>> finding a better way
>>
>>Because there is a better way. That's why there are no levels / layers
>>in HSMWorks and the only levels / layers in SolidWorks are just for
>>drawings.
>>] - jon banquer on Oct 7 2007
>>
>> "The whole level manager needs to be-revamped into somthing usable." -
jon
>>banquer
>>
>> "Layers / levels represent an Autocad past." - jon banquer
>>
>>[
>>I'd also like to know from you or anyone else how it's possible for
>>layers or levels in Mastercam, Surfcam, Gibbscam, etc. to compete with
what
>>SolidWorks uses .... assemblies and configurations.
>>] - jon banquer
>>
>> Find his posts on how useless levels/layers are ...
>>--
>>Cliff
>
>
>Cliff, why do you crosspost this dribble?
>Daveb
jb dribbes?
--
Cliff
|
