On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:24:14 -0400, Cliff <Clhuprich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>[
>Updated 6-17-2008:
>
>the mastercam handbooks page
>
>coming this weekend to the mastercam handbooks page:
>
>Suggestions for covering layers which are not presently covered at all in
>Mastercam Handbook Volume 1 and why making use of layers is so im****tant
for
>machining parts and is such a time saver, working with im****ted files
that can’t
>be machinined “as is” because the part has been designed by someone who
doesn’t
>understand or care about the machining process.
>]
>
>[
>> I swear Iv'e tried job after job to make use of levels. I always end up
>> finding a better way
>
>Because there is a better way. That's why there are no levels / layers
>in HSMWorks and the only levels / layers in SolidWorks are just for
>drawings.
>] - jon banquer on Oct 7 2007
>
> "The whole level manager needs to be-revamped into somthing usable." -
jon
>banquer
>
> "Layers / levels represent an Autocad past." - jon banquer
>
>[
>I'd also like to know from you or anyone else how it's possible for
>layers or levels in Mastercam, Surfcam, Gibbscam, etc. to compete with
what
>SolidWorks uses .... assemblies and configurations.
>] - jon banquer
>
> Find his posts on how useless levels/layers are ...
>--
>Cliff
Cliff, why do you crosspost this dribble?
Daveb
|
