My company is ISO 9001:2000 certified.
http://www.precipart.com/certificate.html
As far as standard parts (Hardware, screws, washers, purchased products
like
o-rings, snap rings, etc, etc.) we set up a numbering system. As we
create
a new assembly, if the hardware is in our system, we'll simply use it. If
it's not, we'll assign the new hardware a the next number in the system.
It does not have to be unique to a specific job/project (ie, as you said
and
have multiple p/n's for the same part)
For example, this is the system we use. We assigned a series of numbers
that are only for purchased parts (95000 series)
95000 (****ms)
95001 (lubrications)
95002 (open bearings)
95003 (****elded bearings)
95004 (retaining rings)
95005 (o-rings)
etc, etc.
We created a standard print (in excel actually) for each. When we need an
o-ring that's not there, we assign the next dash number to what we need.
If
it's a new category, we assign it the next 95000 series number and it
becomes the first dash number. We have our own SWx library of standards
parts that correspond to the 95000 series dash numbers.
If you break down ISO 9000 to it's basic form, it's simply traceability.
Have procedures do***ented and make sure you follow them, and conduct
frequent audits to make sure they are being followed.
IYM
"Gerard Farrell" <gerard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:At2dndMes-YPmpvanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> No - but sense doesn't always seem to come into when working to ISO9000.
> The question is, does the standard explicitly state that we must
uniquely
> number drawings, or can we use a generic numbering system for generic
> drawings? I can see that we need to identify which project a drawing
> refers to, but must that be part of the drawing number or can it be a
> separate box in the drawing template?
>
> Gerry
>
>
>
> "Cliff" <Clhuprich@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:14sag3h19jngv209l4sm2jdme1ltigvssr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:39:35 +0100, "Gerard Farrell"
<gerard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I have a general question about devising a numbering system for CAD
>>>drawings. My engineer insists that every project we work on must have a
>>>set
>>>of unique drawing numbers, even if the drawing is one from a pool of
>>>standard components. To me this seems counter-intuitive; if a drawing
is
>>>of
>>>a standard part (albeit one that we get manufactured) then it would
make
>>>sense to me to leave the number unchanged. Otherwise we have 2 drawings
>>>of
>>>the same part that have different drawing numbers.
>>>
>>>Does ISO9000 state absolutely that drawing numbers must be unique, or
is
>>>my
>>>engineer over-interpreting things?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Gerry
>>
>> If you had a standard bolt used many places on many projects
>> would you get them from diferent suppliers & from different
>> boxes?
>> --
>> Cliff
>
>
|
