Solids were different in autocad 12. Autocad 12 solids were based on the
Advanced Modeling Extension (AME). In Autocad 2000, Autodesk have change
the
solid engine, using ACIS solids instead. That is the only explanation I
can
see for Revit 6.1 being able to keep AME solid from ACAD 12 "solid" in a
round trip with autocad 2004. It will be really usefull if Autocad and
Revit
were able to keep ACIS solid "solid" in a round trip translation.
David
"Scott Davis" <scott@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> a écrit dans le message
de
news:40fd6864@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Not sure if solids from r12 were 'different' than in later releases.
True,
> Revit cannot translate AutoCAD solids, only 3D faces. To convert to
> something Revit can read, from AutoCAD, run the 3DSOUT command, then
open
a
> new file in AutoCAD, and im****t the 3DS file, then save as a DWG. Now
> im****t into Revit. This process converts the solids to Faces.
>
> HTH,
>
> SD
>
> "David Gaucher" <david.gaucher@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:40f75112$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I am new to Revit 6.1. It seems that Revit is still not able read
solid
> from
> > Autocad 2004.
> >
> > A strange behavior happen to me recently. While I was trying to im****t
a
> 3D
> > model from autocad 2004 to Revit 6.1, almost everything from Autocad
solid
> > was dropped and therefor disappear in Revit except pieces of furniture
> > originally modelised in ACAD 12 that had remain solid in Revit... Does
> > anyone have some explanation and how can it work too for newer solids.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
>
>
|
