Re: Which Intellicad do you use?

How about the do***entation.  How good and precise is it?  

Is it strictly an electronic version?

OR does one look to acad for info?

jl



On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:07:05 GMT, "CW" <cmagers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>There's no reason that should ever be a problem.
>
>"Joe Lauton" <JL@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:t837n21nqd9l7631j82vapakgoa3jp0pvq@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 02:36:11 GMT, "CW" <cmagers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >How is it "not available"? Just set it that way. I don't do anything
in
>> >metric so I don't know if this is considered bad practice or not but I
>see
>> >no reason to stick to ridged scale sizes in CAD.
>> >
>> >"jg" <jg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >news:FMLch.2166$HU.1049@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > My work is most often 1=50
>> >> or 1=100, 1=75 would very often be ideal but it's not available.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> The site had some (primitive) structural routines as add-ons all non
>> English.
>> Is there ever a problem with printer drivers, if an inkjet plotter is
>> not available.  Will details scale correctly if sent to a regular
>> 'system'  laser or inkjet printer?
>>
>> jl
>