Re: Version compatibility

<agnel.kurian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1149061340.614413.317590@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > .......is not reason to say they are wrong,
> > buggy, inadequate etc. ....
>
> They are wrong in holding back such an im****tant bug fix from the
> community Cannot blame the developers here. Most developers would be
> happy to fix that bug. Problem is that we developers get our paychecks
> from people who want to keep the goodies for themselves.
>
I was commenting only on the program's performance. I believe there is
"community" development and then there is individual development, not paid
for by the community. I remember the consortium actually bought one piece
of
development from Bricscad which it had planned to contract to outside
developers, as an expediency. Either way it would not have been community
work. I don't know whether particular development makes it back to the
core
program eventually or not, it's something I have always wondered. CMS for
instance is remarkably cheap, but I always had the impression it never
runs
as well as certain others who do their own development... depends who is
paying.